Yessss! It’s
that time of the year again, ladies and gentlemen! Time to see how just right or wrong Hollywood
is at assessing itself over the last year.
It’s the Oscars!!!
I’ll get the lesser categories out of the way before
debating the big kahuna. I haven’t seen
everything, but I’ll bold the films I discuss that I have seen, which may or
may not affect my credibility when discussing different categories. And keep in mind that these are not the films
which I think are going to win. It’s the films that I think should win. If I ran Hollywood, here’s how things would
go.
Best Sound Mixing – The
most technical of these would have to be American Sniper because of the
battle scenes. I saw this film in IMAX,
and the sound was jacked way up, so my ability to catch subtleties was quite
low, but the sound was well done. The
runner-up would go to Birdman because of the mix on the
rooms they were in, trying to synch with what the camera position was, to not
have voices and noise appear out of place or disorienting. What should
have been up for at least a
nomination was Selma. How this got
overlooked may be because it isn’t a film that necessitates outstanding sound
mixing, but the scene of the night march where the police attack the protestors
was so well-mixed that I was actually looking behind and around me in the
theater because I thought there was something going on between patrons. Interstellar
was probably good, too, but I didn’t see it.
Documentary Feature –
Don’t count on me for this one, because I only saw Virunga, and while the
film was well-done, the likelihood of it beating a film about Edward Snowden or
Vietnam is low. It’s odd that two of
these movies are about photographers.
Makeup – Only three
films up in this category, but the clear winner has to be Guardians of the Galaxy. Foxcatcher’s makeup contribution is
really just to one character, and the makeup on Tilda Swinton in Grand
Budapest, while good, isn’t as much of an impact as what is going on in Guardians.
Costume Design – I’m a
bit perplexed with what Vice is doing in this category
(didn’t seem special to me). Budapest
has such a strong visual style that the costumes link straight into the
seamless flow. Mr. Turner, a period piece,
is done very well. The other two are
based on fairy tales, so by rule, they have to be crazy with the costumes. Edge towards Maleficent, based on what I’ve seen.
Cinematography – Even
though I didn’t really like Birdman, I was set to give this to
the film because the camera work in it was extremely athletic. Then, I saw Ida, and all that went
out of the window. Ida is stunningly
gorgeous and rightly deserves this award.
In some instances, this is a study in the rule of thirds. Characters’ heads are often down at the
bottom of the screen, and perspective lines draw the eye exactly where the
director wants us to look (even if that isn’t the action of the scene). Intentionally shot in 4:3 aspect ratio. So impressive. Third would be Budapest, for some of the
delightfully playful camera work. Turner is beautiful but seemed a bit muddied (Kim
maintains that this was on purpose, given Turner’s work, but I disagree). Unbroken should not win, nor be nominated, for any award. Ever.
Production Design –
This is a hard one. Imitation Game and Turner
are both period pieces, very well done. Budapest
is an alternate universe period piece, elegantly crafted. Interstellar
is this year’s Gravity. Into the Woods is a fairy tale. All have a distinct style. However, two can depart from reality (Budapest and Woods),
since there is fantasy at work, while two have to try to be as close to reality
as possible, and one is trying to be technically realistic. My heart goes with Budapest, as the created
world is so engaging, with second place going to Turner (which to me did a
slightly better job at maintaining period than Imitation).
Original Song – I
couldn’t care less about this category.
The song up for Selma has absolutely nothing to do
with the film’s actual soundtrack (which is 1960s) and was jarring when played
over the ending credit sequence. “Everything
Is Awesome” does make me smile, however.
Can I vote for that because it was fun?
Yeah, I can (my list, right?).
But best song tends to suck the air out of the room when the Academy
feels the need to showcase each song throughout the broadcast. Great moments for a bathroom break.
Original Score – Again,
the movie that should at least be nominated (if not win) this category isn’t
even up – Birdman. Jazz drumming
to a persistently moving, uncut shot?
That one moment where Keaton and Norton walk by the drummer, and diegetic
sound becomes non-diegetic but doesn’t miss a beat? Masterful.
Is it not up because it was a single instrument score instead of
orchestra? Maybe. I don’t recall anything of greatness out of
the music in Imitation or The
Theory of Everything when it came to sound. I’d go with Budapest for what it
contributed to the film, with Turner second (much less obtrusive
yet more appropriate than Imitation).
Documentary Short
Subject – Saw none of these. Current
betting odds have Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
as the favorite.
Short Film, Live Action
– Same for this. Odds are on The
Phone Call. What’s up with suicide
hotline movies?
Short Film, Animated –
Only saw one of these, Feast, but it’s Pixar, so you
couldn’t place a safer bet if you tried.
Film Editing – Things
have become so spastic with editing in the digital age that when someone stops editing, it’s a big deal. If you approach film editing as how best to
tell a story from various shot perspectives, the LOSER in this category is Boyhood
(actually, that would go for writing, directing and acting as well, since this
has no story). Sniper only gets this right during the away
scenes, because the home front scenes are so poor on many levels (directing,
acting, editing, writing), so you can’t give credit for getting things half right. That leaves Budapest, Imitation,
and Whiplash
– all great movies. However, Whiplash is more character study, and while
parts of the movie get more intense because
of the precision of the editing, other parts are more straightforward, and
the acting does the heavy lifting. Imitation’s
editing is a little more paint-by-numbers.
Winner: Budapest.
Visual Effects – Not
going to waste your time – it’s Guardians.
Sound Editing –
Read: Sound Capturing / Manufacturing. This I give to Birdman because of how
hard this must have been working with a constantly moving camera (and therefore
constantly moving sound capture which needed to stay the hell out of the
cameraman’s way). Interstellar and Hobbitzez
gets honorable mentions for created sound to mix in with capture, as I’m sure
there had to be a ton. Again, fuck Unbroken.
Animated Feature – One
of the greatest animators of all time, Hayao Miyazaki, retired last year, and
his The
Wind Rises, while nominated, didn’t win. This isn’t surprising, given the film’s
subject matter. Now, this year, another director
from Studio Ghibli, the person who started the studio and discovered and hired
Miyazaki, Isao Takahata, who, in my estimation, is superior to Miyazaki, is up
for his last film, The Tale of Princess Kaguya. I won’t be able to see it until after the
Oscars, and I’m already biased towards it anyway, so I’d love to see him
win. He won’t though. How to Train Your Dragon 2 should
win. It’s a good movie (better than Big
Hero 6), but I’d so love it if Takahata won. My guess is that he won’t even be in the
audience. But, to whomever wins:
Best Foreign Language
Film – I heard Leviathan was
good. Didn’t get a chance to see it
(where’s Force Majeure?). I’m not saying Ida was an outstanding film, but it’s so flipping gorgeous, I don’t
really care.
Adapted Screenplay – My
category!!! Yay! Sadly, I’ve read none of the literature these
films are based on. However, I’ve heard
so much about how Imitation, Sniper, and Theory got things “wrong”
(which is normal) that I’m dissuaded to choose them. And since Whiplash doesn’t have a
shot at much, and I liked it so much, I’ll vote for it.
Original Screenplay – Grand
Budapest Hotel!!! I can’t choose
anything else. That film was so much
fun. Honorable Mention goes to Foxcatcher
(which, from what I read, should really have been up in the Adapted Screenplay
category).
Best Supporting Actress
– The thing I liked most about Birdman was Emma Stone. And yeah, Patricia Arquette was good in Boyhood,
but that’s largely because she was acting with an emo golem, so of course she
looked better. Knightly was good, but
she was so minor. And someone needs to
stop nominating Streep every time she’s in something. Some may cry “blasphemer!,” but I don’t
really care. Did you see Mamma
Mia? Let it go … let it goo-ooo …
I won’t be upset if Laura Dern wins.
She’s good in anything she’s in.
I’m just not ever going to see Wild.
Best Actress – Since I
only saw two of these films, I don’t think it’s fair for me to comment. But Pike was scary as hell in Gone
Girl. I’d never be upset to see
Cotillard win anything, because she’s brilliant. So is Julianne Moore. I didn’t really see Jones’s character as a
lead role, so I’m not sure why she’s up for this category.
Best Actor – It’s
pretty obvious that Redmayne is going to win, and he should, because the job he
had to do was very difficult, and he did it well. However, it’s sort of like whenever we have a
movie about someone who’s handicapped, if they get it, then the race is over
before it starts. I always think of
Daniel Day Lewis and My Left Foot for things like
this. Carrell was creepy-eerie,
Cumberbatch was outstanding, Cooper played a character rather than a hyper mess
(see his last two David O. Russell turns).
And Keaton was, well, Keaton.
They all did well, but what Redmayne had to do to be that character was
harder work than all four other actors combined.
Best Director – The sad
thing is that Linklater is going to get this award for essentially the same
reason why I give the award to Redmayne.
It’s not a good film, but it
took so much to do that people will recognize the effort. Anderson and Miller told much better stories
through the works they made, without doubt, and Tyldum told the “important”
story. If technical prowess was the
order of the day (which it was last year with Cuaron), then Inarritu would get
it this year.
Best Picture – I saw
all of them, so I’m going to rank them, worst to best (some of this may sound
familiar from my Christmas watch post, since I saw about half these films
during that time):
8. The Theory of Everything – So
boring. So didn’t care. And actually, if you live through a similar
situation (which I emphatically hope you do not), and your wife takes that good
care of you, and you leave her for your physical therapist, what hope does any
other marriage have? I realize she
wasn’t an angel with her encounter with the young Colin Firthy guy (and the
dramaticness of Hawking getting violently ill when the infidelity occurred
because no bad deed goes underscored), but she stuck by him through a lot of
stuff and gave up so much. And he left
her! Yet the marriage in Sniper stuck together. Work the math on that one.
7. Boyhood – Again, this is not a good
movie. There is no protagonist. There is no plot. If you want to look at it pragmatically, it
says that people make bad choices and tend to either repeat them (the mother)
or choose to not remedy them (the father), even if there are others who rely on
them (the children). So, everyone’s
fucked. At least in the interim, we can
play a little Wii Sports or take up
photography. The best part about the
film, for me, was what I considered the punch line. It is towards the end of the film, and Mason
is packing up to head off to college. He
returns to the kitchen to find his mother crying. She says, taking off her glasses, “This is
the worst day of my life” and explains that what she’s been doing for the last
20 years was trying to raise the children and do what she thought was
right. Now, both of her children are
leaving, off to have their own lives, leaving her alone to meander into old
age. At that point, I looked over at Kim
and said, as I often do, “I’m so glad we don’t have kids.” This is by no means meant to offend those of you
who do have kids. But I think those that
do have kids measure out their lifespans in radically different ways from those
of us who don’t (especially women). That
my life hasn’t been tied or relegated to caring for another individual has
allowed me to do pretty much what I want.
I’m very happy about that. So,
this movie reinforced my happiness in my life choices, which I don’t think was what
Linklater was going for.
If this video is a broken link, it's because of copyright trolls (which is why I could only get the Spanish subtitled version).
6. Birdman – Previously, I compared the
no-cut camerawork in this film to the far superior Russian Ark. But the pretentious,
“hey-whiz-bang-look-at-me” approach the film takes is so irritating that it is
off-putting. Aside from Emma Stone and
the soundtrack and the technical aptitude of how this was shot, it came up
lacking. And it could have been more
interesting. The whole point of the play
that Riggan was adapting, Carver’s “What We Talk about When We Talk about
Love,” given the people flitting around in this movie, there could have been an
exploration on a meta level of the meaning of love. But the characters are so shallow or not
fully thought through (which is ironic given that Mike is all about working on
character initially) that what could have been an insightful investigation is
hijacked by headlong changes of camera direction. So, I like Birdman like I admire beautiful dancing.
5. American Sniper – I’ve seen way too
much on how Cooper’s Kyle is not like the actual Kyle, but that’s not Cooper’s
fault. That’s Eastwood’s fault. And the whole fake baby is just noise. I did care about this character, and I do think
this would be a great double feature with The Hurt Locker of two men in
specialized, dangerous positions who can save lives and have immense guilt
about leaving their brothers to fight without them when they return home. That no one else he fights with is fleshed
out and the home front scenes are tired clichés is Eastwood’s fault. And Eastwoood knows how to direct, so I’m not
sure how this got off track. But the
combat scenes are jarring and well done, and I admire seeing Cooper really act
rather than channel a crazy person, and that might also be Eastwood’s doing (in
fact, given what I know about how Eastwood directs actors, I’m sure of it). So, the good things were good, and the bad
things were bad. But not everything was
bad, so that’s good.
4. The Imitation Game – This is a group
of people who really believed in the project they were working on and wanted to
tell this story. Whenever you see
Benedict Cumberbatch talk about this movie, he’s not talking about this movie. He’s talking about how important Alan Turing
was. It is a well-done movie, but there
isn’t anything earthshattering about it – it’s competently done. Cumberbatch acts very well. It’s not mind-blowing, but it tells a good
story.
3. Selma – I didn’t want to see this
movie. It’s one of those “I heard this
one already.” But, I couldn’t go see the
other seven and not go see it. So, I
went, and I’m so glad I did. This is
very similar to The Imitation Game in its execution – famous person working
against evil with lives on the line.
Lasting legacies. And both films
dealt with a situation that had a sense of urgency. But oddly enough, I felt that urgency more in
this film than I did in Imitation. Imitation was so localized to the lab where they were building Christopher
that we rarely saw the devastation going on in the outside world. But we were constantly confronted with the
direness of actions in this film.
Juxtapose the scene where King goes to see Cager Lee in the morgue after
his grandson has been killed with the scene in the warehouse where Peter is
told by everyone that they cannot stop the attack on his brother’s convoy
because then the Germans will know something is up with the code. One person dead. One person going to die. Cager and Peter deeply affected. Which scene seemed more real? Which did you invest in emotionally the
most? That’s why Selma’s better. Moments like that.
2. Whiplash – The problem with this
world is mediocrity and just skating by on doing ok. Every human being has the potential of being
something truly amazing. So few actually
reach that potential. But in order to
achieve that potential, it must be relentlessly pursued. And sometimes, it is necessary for someone
outside of oneself to push one on. It’s
a rather age-old quandary – is it necessary to suffer for art? Can one be great without having to overcome
obstacles in order to reach higher levels?
That question is posed in this film.
Someone asked me if I thought the film was like Black Swan, where a
person goes crazy in her pursuit to be the best. I’d say no – Andrew stays defiantly sane in
the face of Fletcher’s onslaught.
Sacrifice does not mean madness (although realistically, there is some
teetering here). I really appreciated
the ideas this film dove deep into, and the performances were riveting. This is not an incredibly technical film
(really, the opposite of Birdman), but very well done.
1. The Grand Budapest Hotel – I know
this isn’t going to win. I don’t
care. This is the most fun I’ve had
watching a movie in a long time. And,
I’m not a Wes Anderson fan. I usually
find him too pretentious, too Birdman-y. And I’ve read other reviews where people say
the same thing: “Gee, normally don’t
like his stuff, but loved this film.”
Not sure what he finally had click in this one that he didn’t have going
in, say, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, but whatever it was (maybe
the limited use of Jason Schwartzman? Zing!), I hope it stays clicked
over. I think it’s criminal that Ralph
Fiennes was not nominated for best actor.
The job he does in this is delicious.
And there you have
it. Most of my picks won’t win, but I
don’t really care. Take that, Academy.
No comments:
Post a Comment